- Is Substack the Media Future We Want?
- The Men Who Are Killing America’s Newspapers
- Why newsrooms need to stop transforming and start changing
- All the newsroom’s men: How one-third of “The Watergate Three” got written out of journalism history
- 54 newsrooms, 9 countries, and 9 core ideas: Here’s what two researchers found in a yearlong quest…
Journalists have a reputation for dismissing data about their stories. But it’s undeserved. After all, the axiom “if it bleeds, it leads” describes a newsroom practice driven by the metrics of newsstand sales and broadcast ratings. Pulitzers and Emmys are qualitative data that indicates a reporter’s work is respected by her peers. Journalists don’t hate …
Shared by 67, including Charles Baldwin, Javi Cantón @email@example.com, Cătălina Movileanu, Nieman Reports, Oscar MacDonald
Why newsrooms need to stop transforming and start changing - The news industry has had the greatest gift of all when it comes to disruption: time. And it squandered it.
«Good journalism costs more than just good technology, it costs people.»
The newsletter service is a software company that, by mimicking some of the functions of newsrooms, has made itself difficult to categorize.
Shared by 148, including Mark Little, Simon Wüthrich, Kevin_Indig, Mark Kaigwa, Javi Cantón @firstname.lastname@example.org
Shared by 49, including luis antónio santos, Jeremy Caplan
What experts have to say about the use of machine learning in the newsroom, and what data journalists can learn from it — Notes from the…
Some reporters can build a career around their own personal brands. But doing great work requires an infrastructure, including a lot of talented people who don't get bylines. Barry Sussman — the…
Inside Alden Global Capital, the secretive hedge fund gutting newsrooms and damaging democracy
The business case for diversity and inclusion in newsrooms is important, but emphasizing the moral case is required for real and lasting change.
How does Refind curate?
It’s a mix of human and algorithmic curation, following a number of steps:
- We monitor 10k+ sources and 1k+ thought leaders on hundreds of topics—publications, blogs, news sites, newsletters, Substack, Medium, Twitter, etc.
- In addition, our users save links from around the web using our Save buttons and our extensions.
- Our algorithm processes 100k+ new links every day and uses external signals to find the most relevant ones, focusing on timeless pieces.
- Our community of active users gets the most relevant links every day, tailored to their interests. They provide feedback via implicit and explicit signals: open, read, listen, share, mark as read, read later, «More/less like this», etc.
- Our algorithm uses these internal signals to refine the selection.
- In addition, we have expert curators who manually curate niche topics.
The result: lists of the best and most useful articles on hundreds of topics.
How does Refind detect «timeless» pieces?
We focus on pieces with long shelf-lives—not news. We determine «timelessness» via a number of metrics, for example, the consumption pattern of links over time.
How many sources does Refind monitor?
We monitor 10k+ content sources on hundreds of topics—publications, blogs, news sites, newsletters, Substack, Medium, Twitter, etc.
Can I submit a link?
Indirectly, by using Refind and saving links from outside (e.g., via our extensions).
How can I report a problem?
When you’re logged-in, you can flag any link via the «More» (...) menu. You can also report problems via email to email@example.com
Who uses Refind?
300k+ smart people start their day with Refind. To learn something new. To get inspired. To move forward. Our apps have a 4.9/5 rating.
Is Refind free?
Yes, it’s free!
How can I sign up?
Head over to our homepage and sign up by email or with your Twitter or Google account.