A duck walks into a pharmacy and says, ‘Give me some lip balm – and put it on my bill’. Whether you laughed or not – and I have my doubts – this is, at least technically, a joke. Specifically, it’s…
Do humans always want more, or are we sometimes just happy with our lot? This debate has long raged in multiple disciplines: economics, politics, and even philosophy. And whether an unlimited desire…
By Emma Young. Psychology provides some intriguing insights into how best to handle conversations, to turn strangers into new friends, and new friends into life-long confidantes.
«So, go on, next time you’re with a stranger, why not try striking up a conversation — it’ll probably go better than you think»
By Emma Young. People call ideas they already consider unbelievable “conspiracy theories”, rather than being influenced by the label to stop believing them.
By Emma Young. Caffeine restored vigilant attention to regular levels – but had barely any impact on another type of performance that is important for all kinds of jobs.
The findings have practical implications for how the learning-by-teaching approach is applied in education and training. By Christian Jarrett
By Emily Reynolds. Time management skills more strongly correlated with wellbeing than with academic or job performance in meta-analysis.
By Emma Young. But timing matters: students only benefited if the second viewing was immediately before a test.
«These new results certainly suggest that this isn’t right: double-time viewing was just as good as normal viewing. It seems, then, that as long as the material can still be accurately perceived and comprehended, it’s okay to speed up playback.»
By Matthew Warren. People with aphantasia also show deficits when describing hypothetical future events.
By Emma Young. But top performers do offer more advice, which can be misinterpreted as a sign of quality.
By Emily Reynolds. “Excellencism” predicted higher creativity and increased openness, while perfectionism predicted lower scores on these measures
By Matthew Warren. Study is one of first to work with industry to obtain real data about people’s playing habits.
How does Refind curate?
It’s a mix of human and algorithmic curation, following a number of steps:
- We monitor 10k+ sources and 1k+ thought leaders on hundreds of topics—publications, blogs, news sites, newsletters, Substack, Medium, Twitter, etc.
- In addition, our users save links from around the web using our Save buttons and our extensions.
- Our algorithm processes 100k+ new links every day and uses external signals to find the most relevant ones, focusing on timeless pieces.
- Our community of active users gets the most relevant links every day, tailored to their interests. They provide feedback via implicit and explicit signals: open, read, listen, share, mark as read, read later, «More/less like this», etc.
- Our algorithm uses these internal signals to refine the selection.
- In addition, we have expert curators who manually curate niche topics.
The result: lists of the best and most useful articles on hundreds of topics.
How does Refind detect «timeless» pieces?
We focus on pieces with long shelf-lives—not news. We determine «timelessness» via a number of metrics, for example, the consumption pattern of links over time.
How many sources does Refind monitor?
We monitor 10k+ content sources on hundreds of topics—publications, blogs, news sites, newsletters, Substack, Medium, Twitter, etc.
Can I submit a link?
Indirectly, by using Refind and saving links from outside (e.g., via our extensions).
How can I report a problem?
When you’re logged-in, you can flag any link via the «More» (...) menu. You can also report problems via email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Who uses Refind?
250k+ smart people start their day with Refind. To learn something new. To get inspired. To move forward. Our apps have a 4.9/5 rating.
Is Refind free?
Yes, it’s free!
How can I sign up?
Head over to our homepage and sign up by email or with your Twitter or Google account.